展开查看  Public museums and art galleries are not needed because people can see the historical objects and works by using computers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Noticeably , the internet have made our lives more convenient since it paved the way for us to do anything we want to. Yet , some individuals suppose that there is no need to construct art galleries and museums where historical stuffs are being protected and preserved; and I strongly disapprove with this view and believe that those public museums have their meaning of existence.

A large proportion of historical relics have been constructed as galleries and enable tourists to have a glimpse of the history of this heritage which reflect the ancestors intelligence and their diversity culture. Apart from that art gallery is a symbol of a country’s civilization since it collect the masterpieces of famous artists and protect them carefully ; thus , people from all corners of the globe can witness the country’s glory and greatness. Inevitably , the importance of galleries should not be neglected.

On the other hand , the internet indeed spare human beings access pieces of information from visiting the art galleries . The internet could convey information to us through laptops and prevent us from back and forth to historical relics . However , the internet is only a supplementary tool for people to gain the knowledge of art stuffs and can not take place of art museums , since it can not bring us visual effect .

Thus , I hold an attitude that art galleries need to protect by both public and the government , the history and civilization of human being will be preserved and our future generation will have the opportunity to review our brilliant history.
作者 匿名用户
Mon Sep 10 11:20:59 UTC 2012